[QUOTE=CWUTrainer;222670]Why oh why do people go back and forth with studies.... Here is the deal people. Being a person in the nutrition research field, the lead of three research teams, with about 35 research studies on Sports Nutrition…. Ill let you all in on a little secret…Studies are a self-selecting success. Imagine this, you have a hypothesis, in this case, a hypothesis on the effects of glutamine on humans. You do the study and get the results. If the results are what you wanted and expected, you publish them. If they are not, you toss them out, alter the method and subject, and retest, reanalyze and bingo, you have your successful results. So I think it is great that you all are publishing studies, but here is the truth. THE AREA OF SPORTS NUTRITION IS PRETTY MUCH SUMMED UP, ESPECIALLY IN THE AREA OF FOOD SUPPLEMENTATION….So when some jack-ass is like hey….glutamine is worthless…look at this study I found. I think…wow, you found a study. I can create a study that “shows” (its always shows saying that there may be a correlation, not a proven fact) women are more likely impregnated when eating jello. How so? Well I would create a study; gather a sample of women who hope to get pregnant. Feed half of them jello, and keep repeating this study until I get a substantial number of women on the jello diet pregnant compared to the jello-less….
Guys…why question the fact that glutamine is worthless. Think about this. Glutamine is the number one amino; therefore, of course glutamine supplementation would have a positive impact on lean mass gains. Stop questioning obvious facts. You want to question ****…question how much, what type of delivery system and when is the best to take supplements….
And I’m done…[/QUOTE
No way in hell could i have said/agree with you more brother. put all these cry babies in their spot.
|