How many people ACTUALLY TOOK their PCT and Didnt take it?

Iblikewh0dat · 11-13-2005, 09:47 AM

I was lurking around and I came upon the question. How many of you guys actually took your PCT and actually didnt take it?

I ran Deca 300 and Test E for 5 weeks and ran Deca 300 and Sustanon 250 for 5 weeks. I went from 268lbs with 68.9% body fat to 292lbs with 32.3% bodyfat. Since my cycle has been over I have been using clembuterol and I dropped down to 273 and I'm not sure what my body fat is but I know i lost alot around my waist and my face and everything looks slimmer. Btw I used clembuterol for 3 weeks straight. Each week I bump up a pill I stopped at 3 pills and took a break for 2 weeks. I am going to continue clenbuterol starting monday. Could any of you guys give me opinions on what I've done and tell me what you would have done. Thank you.

Void · 11-13-2005, 04:08 PM

68.9%bf and you used steroids wtf..is that a typo?

seekinfo · 11-13-2005, 04:24 PM

same thing i was thinking!!!!! that is extremely high and talk about health issues on top of health issues!

Diesel · 11-13-2005, 04:33 PM

wow, so many things wrong in this post. first off, its a stupid question if you ask me to ask if people did their pct or not. b/c if they didnt, they dont know what they are doing. and i agree with everyone on here that your body fat is way to high to even think about AAS. When doing a cycle you should be at MOST 15% body fat preferably 12%. I would run pct and get everything checked out by a doctor, then get your body fat down to 12% without any drugs.

Iblikewh0dat · 11-13-2005, 05:43 PM

Sorry I didnt go in dept. I first measured my body fat in October of 2004, I used Gear in September of 2005. Though yes my body fat was to high I still used gear and got my body fat down to 32% Inbetween October and September I dont know what the changes were from my bodyfat. I had already gone to the doctor and have FULL CHECK UP and my body is working perfectly fine. Yes I do admit it was a bad idea of using gear at that size but I didnt know much and now I'm willing to learn. In my gym plenty of trainers use gear and have not ran there pct. So I was going along what they have said but I came across very knowledge able people on these boards such as Pain, and Benway83 etc and now I was just asking for some help.

seekinfo · 11-13-2005, 06:33 PM

yes, dont worry about asking questions... some might flame you but some will answer your questions as best as they can, after all thats all that matters, SHAKE THEM HATERS OFF!!

but dude serioully dont even worry about aas or pct untill you bring down your body fat levels!!!!

Diesel · 11-14-2005, 03:04 PM

i agree w/ seekinfo, get the bf down and go from there. and as far as pct, i personally dont know anyone who hasnt done thier pct. but it could just be my experiences.

Banshee20 · 11-14-2005, 05:14 PM

I have had my Body Fat Percentage taken many times and I take other people's BF %'s almost daily as I am currently a personal trainer. I honestly dont think its possible for you to have a body fat % as high as 69%(I should say its not impossible, just not probable). I have a client who weighs about 340 lbs and is very out of shape and his BF% is only around 40%ish.

It sounds to me like you may have started with 68.9 pounds of body fat not a body fat of 68.9% and then worked your way down to having 32.3 pounds of body fat rather than having a body fat of 32.3%. If you started at 268lbs with 68.9 lbs of body fat that would mean that you started with about 200 lbs of lean muscle tissue. This would make your body fat % around 25% not 68.9% which is near impossible if you are dedicated to lifting weights. Does this make sense? I think you mean lbs of fat vs. body fat percentage and that is why everyone is confused. I could be wrong but this sounds like a more resonable explanation for what you are saying.

Banshee

digink · 11-14-2005, 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Banshee20

I have had my Body Fat Percentage taken many times and I take other people's BF %'s almost daily as I am currently a personal trainer. I honestly dont think its possible for you to have a body fat % as high as 69%(I should say its not impossible, just not probable). I have a client who weighs about 340 lbs and is very out of shape and his BF% is only around 40%ish.

It sounds to me like you may have started with 68.9 pounds of body fat not a body fat of 68.9% and then worked your way down to having 32.3 pounds of body fat rather than having a body fat of 32.3%. If you started at 268lbs with 68.9 lbs of body fat that would mean that you started with about 200 lbs of lean muscle tissue. This would make your body fat % around 25% not 68.9% which is near impossible if you are dedicated to lifting weights. Does this make sense? I think you mean lbs of fat vs. body fat percentage and that is why everyone is confused. I could be wrong but this sounds like a more resonable explanation for what you are saying.

Banshee

I agree, I've never seen anyone with 68.9% or whatever you said, I'd think it'd be hard for you to get out of bed with that kinda body fat let alone lift weights.

BigBen · 11-14-2005, 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Banshee20

I have had my Body Fat Percentage taken many times and I take other people's BF %'s almost daily as I am currently a personal trainer. I honestly dont think its possible for you to have a body fat % as high as 69%(I should say its not impossible, just not probable). I have a client who weighs about 340 lbs and is very out of shape and his BF% is only around 40%ish.

It sounds to me like you may have started with 68.9 pounds of body fat not a body fat of 68.9% and then worked your way down to having 32.3 pounds of body fat rather than having a body fat of 32.3%. If you started at 268lbs with 68.9 lbs of body fat that would mean that you started with about 200 lbs of lean muscle tissue. This would make your body fat % around 25% not 68.9% which is near impossible if you are dedicated to lifting weights. Does this make sense? I think you mean lbs of fat vs. body fat percentage and that is why everyone is confused. I could be wrong but this sounds like a more resonable explanation for what you are saying.

Banshee

That sounds exaclyt right about his body fat numbers.

Iblikewh0dat · 01-18-2006, 12:28 AM

well its in a WHILE GUYS and im training again for juice. I want to run 15 weeks of EQ/PRIMO/WINNY. I now weight 254 with 28.1% thats wut the body fat machine say's. i wanna use Juice just to get cut and drop fat. Im not trying to bulk just lean out.