[TRiddy05]

I agree 100% with Zomb. People hate synthol because they dont know anything about it. They see Valentino and others like him and assume that is what you look like if you use it. For one thing I wouldnt be suprised if Valentinos ****ed up arms are implants rather than synthol. If used properly it shouldnt give that retarded puffy ballon look to injected body parts, it can actually increase hardness and vascularity on bodyparts injected. There are many many IFBB pros who use synthol and a few who admit to it. Flex Wheeler is one of them but I would bet anything that Jay, Ronnie and especially Ruhl have used synthol. I personally would not use it because of the risk of muscle tissue necrosis but I can understand why a top IFBB pro who is already a superfreak would use it to bring up a lagging bodypart in order to make his physique more proportional.

[Mygeeto]

Originally Posted by TRiddy05

I agree 100% with Zomb. People hate synthol because they dont know anything about it. They see Valentino and others like him and assume that is what you look like if you use it. For one thing I wouldnt be suprised if Valentinos ****ed up arms are implants rather than synthol. If used properly it shouldnt give that retarded puffy ballon look to injected body parts, it can actually increase hardness and vascularity on bodyparts injected. There are many many IFBB pros who use synthol and a few who admit to it. Flex Wheeler is one of them but I would bet anything that Jay, Ronnie and especially Ruhl have used synthol. I personally would not use it because of the risk of muscle tissue necrosis but I can understand why a top IFBB pro who is already a superfreak would use it to bring up a lagging bodypart in order to make his physique more proportional.

1) valentino is a perfect example of what synthol can do
2) he prolly has both implants and synthol
3) since when has a synthol user come in looking like shawn ray? until then, be quiet.
4) a superfreak wouldnt need or want synthol.. or else.. how did they get the name superfreak to start with?

[Sparky_dustin]

Originally Posted by TRiddy05

it can actually increase hardness and vascularity on bodyparts injected.

Really??? Where's the Vascularity???
musc.popeye.jpg

The following was taken from Wikepedia:
SEO is not an androgen, and does not contain steroids, It is an oil that will remain in circulation for years in the body and it will tend to damage and scar the actual muscles. It is simply a cosmetic that creates scar tissue within the muscle to make it look like it has been trained hard.

It has no place in bodybuilding as it doesn't make your muscles grow, it just creates the illusion that you have muscles where you actually dont. People critisized Lou Ferrigno for getting calf implants because he had ****ty calves, how is this any different?

[Beefcake]

Pwned...

[TRiddy05]

Pwned? Hold the **** on. And whats up with that computer geek language bull ****, go play some warcraft or something.
To Mygeeto:
1) Can is the operative word here. Gregg Valentino is an example of improper synthol use. He is to synthol what say Paul Borressen is to AAS. His results do not reflect on synthol as a whole. Gregg Valentino also used huge amounts of AAS, GH, and slin. But that doesnt mean that AAS, GH, slin are not excellent tool for bodybuilders or that anyone using these substances will look retarded like him.
2) Thats what I said. Whats your point.
3) I could give a **** about Shawn Ray. And Flex Wheeler who did use synthol beat Shawn Ray numerous times at the Olympia. And dont ****ing tell me to be quiet.
4) The superfreaks of today, like Ruhl are on ass loads of AAS, GH, igf, slin, mgf, and probably a lot of **** you or i have never heard of. These guys will do anything to be the best and push their physique to greater limits. Where do they draw the line? I dont know and you dont either.

To Sparky:
Great you posted a pic of synthol gone bad like that proves your point. Go look at a pic of Flex Wheeler and tell me where the vascularity is. If you dont believe me then perhaps you will believe Dave Palumbo, this is from October 2007 MD:
Dave: If you inject the oil deep enough into the muscle using a 22 gauge .5'' needle the muscle will actually look harder and more ripped. The biggest mistake most users make is that they use a 1/2'' insulin pin when spot-injecting and then they wonder why the oil looks like it's under the skin.

Wikipedia is not a good source of information about body building drugs as evidenced by the fact it says: [synthol] is a cosmetic that simply creates scar tissue. That is not accurate at all. Synthol can create scar tissue but that is not why it makes the muscles look bigger. AAS use can create scar tissue too. Finally, like it or not synthol is in bodybuilding and is definetly alive and well in the IFBB. Like it or not its here to stay. And I dont have a problem with Lou's calf implants.

[Sparky_dustin]

All I'm saying is that it's not muscle at all, AAS helps to build muscle Synthol does not. All it does is create the illusion that you have muscles where you dont, so how is that bodybuilding? Any ****head can stick a needle full of oil in his arm and call it muscle, but it takes a comitment and hard work to built muscle.

[BulkLifter]

exactly sparky

[Beefcake]

Originally Posted by TRiddy05

Pwned? Hold the **** on. And whats up with that computer geek language bull ****, go play some warcraft or something.
Shut up, because I'm joking. But you've irked me to actually respond to your relpy.
If you dont believe me then perhaps you will believe Dave Palumbo, this is from October 2007 MD:
Dave: If you inject the oil deep enough into the muscle using a 22 gauge .5'' needle the muscle will actually look harder and more ripped. The biggest mistake most users make is that they use a 1/2'' insulin pin when spot-injecting and then they wonder why the oil looks like it's under the skin.
Dave Palumbo is also one of the ugliest humans alive. He's rivaling Greg Kovacs in the gut war. He has yet to win his pro card if I'm not mistaken.

I didn't even read your ridiculously long comment all the way through, because it was just to much of a rant and rambled on for quite some time. I believe I got the gist of it though. I think you should respect other's opinions instead of just completely denying some of the truths that they have presented.

Also as a side note, I said Pwned (smart-ass) because there's an emoticon with in the in the side section

DUUUUURRRRRRRRRRR!

[Zomb131]

I'm locking this thread.

We have kids here trying to explain why synthol "sucks" with nothing educated behind their thoughts. Synthol is something ALL pro's use.

Zomb131

[Zomb131]

Originally Posted by Mygeeto

1) valentino is a perfect example of what synthol can do
2) he prolly has both implants and synthol
3) since when has a synthol user come in looking like shawn ray? until then, be quiet.
4) a superfreak wouldnt need or want synthol.. or else.. how did they get the name superfreak to start with?

Superfreak? Do you even UNDERSTAND how synthol is used??? Or what it does to the muscle to AID growth?

[Zomb131]

Originally Posted by Sparky_dustin

All I'm saying is that it's not muscle at all, AAS helps to build muscle Synthol does not. All it does is create the illusion that you have muscles where you dont, so how is that bodybuilding? Any ****head can stick a needle full of oil in his arm and call it muscle, but it takes a comitment and hard work to built muscle.

This is a PRIME example of an uneducated post.

Synthol is injected DEEP into the muscle. This massive amount of fatty acid causes the muscle fascia to stretch. This stretch causes more room for muscle fibers to grow.

BBers with lagging body parts use this to aid in growth.

Lets get it straight ladies, 95%+ pros use it. Go to professionalmuscle.com there are pro's (Yes IFBB) on there that support the use of synthol.