New issue of Muscle Mag

shanetrain1973 · 11-30-2006, 02:37 PM

I saw an ad by a company for 3 different kinds of sterioids (deca, win, ?) and these items claim that they are safe enough not to have side effects and don't need estrogen prevention. How can that be true?!? Seems to good to be true to use a steroid and not need a PCT!

**mindstar** · 11-30-2006, 04:05 PM

if it's too good to be true, it stands to reason that it must be false.

Hooking Bull · 11-30-2006, 07:10 PM

Not to derail from the subject of this thread, but I just subscribed to MuscleMag today...woo hoo!

But seriously, MindStar has got it correct. If it's too good to be true, it probably is.

shanetrain1973 · 11-30-2006, 07:28 PM

That's what I figured. If it isn't powerful enough or contain enough things to chemically change the body enough to need a PCT, I know it isn't going to build muscle (not that I'm an expert on gear)!
I definitely don't put anything in to my body that I haven't researched a lot, or if I haven't heard of the company.

shanetrain1973 · 11-30-2006, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hooking Bull

Not to derail from the subject of this thread, but I just subscribed to MuscleMag today...woo hoo!

As far as the mags go MM is one of my favs. They have ads, but not as many as most of them. They also get into the science of a lot of things instead of just listing exercises and pictures that we can get off the net for free. Enjoy!

Hooking Bull · 11-30-2006, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shanetrain1973

As far as the mags go MM is one of my favs. They have ads, but not as many as most of them. They also get into the science of a lot of things instead of just listing exercises and pictures that we can get off the net for free. Enjoy!

Yeah the ads are pretty hard to get around, but at least it better than Flex and Muscle & Fitness. I've always had much respect for MuscleMag! Thanks