Arnold Schwarzenegger

Pain · 03-05-2005, 06:55 PM

click to relarge

Arnold · 03-08-2005, 01:42 AM

Good collection of pics, if I do say so myself.

whitewolf4772 · 03-19-2005, 09:59 PM

hey, did u get these pics from www,schwarzenegger.it?

Tech · 03-19-2005, 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whitewolf4772

hey, did u get these pics from www,schwarzenegger.it?

it looks to be that way

Pain · 04-25-2005, 09:48 AM

Pain · 04-25-2005, 09:55 AM

bodydropped · 04-27-2005, 01:18 AM

amazing

18inchGun · 05-05-2005, 05:10 AM

arnold easily has the best body of all time

xtweak05 · 05-23-2005, 10:31 PM

who is the girl with the rack behind him in that one photo?

SDEWITT · 05-25-2005, 03:16 AM

I dont care how many times Coleman wins the Olympia,
Arnold is best of all time, no question.

580 · 05-27-2005, 06:37 PM

every time i see pics of him it makes me train that much harder

pumpingiron · 05-29-2005, 05:08 AM

He is and always will be the king

He could have been really perfect if his legs where a little larger, abs more defined and his arms a little smaller (They seem too big in proportion to his upper body). But that's minor details. He is a bb god.

Q80_MuscleHed · 05-29-2005, 06:48 AM

No one of these days athletes can match this amazing man

pruvenw · 05-29-2005, 02:24 PM

wow.. he really is the best

Ironslave · 05-29-2005, 02:57 PM

I agree with everyone, there will never be another Arnold.

Stachio · 05-31-2005, 03:50 PM

i agree and what always makes me laugh when people say that todays competitiors are bigger and more ripped i say remember that arnold was at his best from age 22 to 28 todays best are 33 to 40 (ronnie) so lets just think if arnold had 12 extra yrs of training how good would he have been

coofoostu · 06-01-2005, 05:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stachio

i agree and what always makes me laugh when people say that todays competitiors are bigger and more ripped i say remember that arnold was at his best from age 22 to 28 todays best are 33 to 40 (ronnie) so lets just think if arnold had 12 extra yrs of training how good would he have been

Definatly, no one considers this.

Oh yeah and hdogg you're wrong, im the next arnold haha!

Blond Bomber · 06-01-2005, 08:51 AM

On the other hand, what if Muscle Tech were around on arnolds time? Then we'd see more of those nice Greg Kovacs lines, especially GUT.

pumpingiron · 06-01-2005, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stachio

i agree and what always makes me laugh when people say that todays competitiors are bigger and more ripped i say remember that arnold was at his best from age 22 to 28 todays best are 33 to 40 (ronnie) so lets just think if arnold had 12 extra yrs of training how good would he have been

Right on point!!!

But he left the right time appearantly. He will be remembered as long as bodybuilding exists. A true legend. He made bb popular IMO.

We should get him on this board. LOL

**fahad** · 06-01-2005, 05:31 PM

arnold was always the guy who standed out back in the days....he had a great phsique and great lines and small waist...that wut bb is all about....

EneMy@fSelf · 06-01-2005, 09:30 PM

Bring Achnuld here...

Seriously now, hes a legend just like the undertaker in wrestling.. u cant replace that man... (well maybe bad comparison but u get the picture)

Diesel · 06-01-2005, 11:58 PM

A lot of those pics are in his book. If you dont have his book I would definately get it.

hosamfares · 06-06-2005, 04:55 PM

arnold is best
if he is now he can defeat ronnie so easly
just see him and study him he will have what it takes in each single muscle even it is geneticaly defect and defeat ronnie

Mass Monster · 06-06-2005, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hosamfares

arnold is best
if he is now he can defeat ronnie so easly
just see him and study him he will have what it takes in each single muscle even it is geneticaly defect and defeat ronnie

You are an idiot, ronnie can wipe the floor with Arnold.

pumpingiron · 06-06-2005, 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hosamfares

arnold is best
if he is now he can defeat ronnie so easly
just see him and study him he will have what it takes in each single muscle even it is geneticaly defect and defeat ronnie

Arnold defeat Ronnie? No f***ing way dude!!!

You should study Ronnie a little. Ronnie beats arnold in every way. Size, symmetri and he is even more cut.

richy · 06-12-2005, 12:46 AM

Hello from EL Paso

Stachio · 06-15-2005, 07:43 PM

um i disagree with the line that ronnie beats arnold in every muscle group what about arnold's chest and also what about ronnies abs... arnold kills him there

Arnold_Dynasty · 06-21-2005, 08:49 PM

yea i agree ronie dosent kill arnold in everything thing i think arnold chest was better then his also those ****ed up abs that coleman has r nothing compared to arnold abs everything else i give and coleman its lucky arnold wasnt around his time to compete with him!

SmallButGettingThere · 06-22-2005, 05:09 AM

or so you say mwahahahahahhahahaha jk :lol:

marko · 07-25-2005, 02:44 PM

I think Arnold has way better lines than anybody ever has. his upper body just was massive and had such good flow from muscle to muscle. I dont think any one can match arnolds physique. He could have used some more work on his legs and calves. Ronnie kills him in the mass category though (monster). Hom many of you think arnold was on steroids?? and same for ronnie?? another thing..do they do drug testing for the olympia?? just curious.