good idea vicky. i'll write down a bit of my experiences
INBF (amatuer division of the WNBF): very well run show, things moved smoothly. Judging was very consistant. Overall I thought it was very good. The only downside I can see with this organization is the pro organization (WNBF) is restrictive to their athletes as far as not allowing them to compete in other orgs & not offering any compensation for this restriction. The one other downside is their website is absolutely terrible... you can't find pictures of hardly anyone!
OCB: done 2 ocb shows. Pretty much the same comments as the INBF... though one of the shows ran kind of late... but it also had around 100 competitors. Judging pretty consistant. The downside is they are new and not as established as the INBF/WNBF, the plus side being their pro division is not restrictive and their websites are top notch
NGA: done 2 NGA shows. One was horribly ran, and the other was ran... ok, but ran long. Judging in one was very inconsistant but very good in the other. Overall I liked this organization pretty well the downside being they don't give you much exposure even though they've been around a long time. The website looks like a 2 year old put it together and hasn't been updated in some time (since 2004 or something)
ABA/INBA: These shows were ok, but i felt the drug testing was a little... weird. The shows were also done at venues that were kind of small and the shows didn't draw many people. On the plus side they do get pictures on their website relatively quickly, however the website's quality isn't that great.
i hope other add their input.
-Layne |