Quote:
Originally Posted by GettinITDone Could you or someone post the link to that article?! I read it a long time ago, but was looking for it forever a month or so ago. I need to print it off and leave it in my gym bag for leg day (for the onlookers). I remember it had little diagrams and everything (if I remember correctly?). Thanks! |
(Here's from Christian Thibaudeau)
In case you need some ammo defending full squats to the ego-squatters, here's why they're actually safer than partial squats:
• The deceleration path is longer during the full squat. Thus the deceleration is slower during the full squat. The faster the deceleration, the greater the risk of injury.
• It's been established that the most unstable knee angle is 90 degrees. Does it make sense to stop (in a rapid manner) and change direction at the most unstable knee angle? It makes about as much sense as hitting the breaks of your car and trying for a 180 degrees turn as you hit a patch of
ice! (For most of you, a squat where your knee angle is 90 degrees equates to about a 1/4 squat.)
• Full squatting can actually strengthen the tendons of the knees, making the articulation more stable.
• Full squatting leads to balanced lower body development, while shallow squatting can lead to quad dominance which is the cause of many injuries.
• In the shallow squat you use more weight (that's why it's an ego lift). If you can't full squat a weight, you have no business quarter-squatting it! Your structures (bones, tendons, ligaments) aren't well adapted enough to sustain the load and you risk injury.
• Full back squats can make more difference in sport performance than any other exercise. Notice that I advocate a close-stance full squat with an upright trunk. This is the only way an athlete should squat.
(I can't post URL until my post count reaches 15. Up to now, I can't post the source yet so... please excuse me.)